Exit Through the Gift Shop cont’d.

He explains how the film came to be and talks about meeting the unlikely videographer, Thierry Guetta, who shot much of the footage of the street artists we see in the film over a period of eight years.

Banksy, http://www.banksy.co.uk

Banksy, http://www.banksy.co.uk

Not surprisingly, Banksy was looking for someone to document his ephemeral works.  Through other street artist contacts such as Shepard Fairey, he met Guetta who taped his artistic activities and helped him navigate the terrain during his first visit to L.A. It turns out that Guetta was a huge Banksy fan – who, by then, was very well-known as one of the best street artists in the world.   So for Thierry, this was a dream come true.  Banksy had been anonymously creating street art in the UK and progressively internationally since the late ’80′s / early ’90′s.  What separated his works from simple urban graffiti and other street art was that his works were visually compact political and/or social statements that were usually stenciled onto buildings, underpasses, bridges, etc.  He targeted social inequities, disproportionate hierarchies of power and excesses in consumerism.  His pieces were and are often clever, amusing and very accessible.  They play directly to the sensibilities of the everyday passerby.

In addition to being a great street artist, Banksy is also a first rate provocateur poking fun at the pretentiousness and superficialities of consumerism, politics, and the institutionalized

Banksy, Chimps in Parliament

Banksy, Chimps in Parliament

contemporary arts world.  One of his better known pranks was the surreptitious placement of his own pieces on the walls of major museums and galleries in London and New York.  He said, “To actually (have to) go through the process of having a painting selected must be quite boring.  It’s a lot more fun to go and put your own one up.”  To their credit, the British Museum added the piece he mounted in their galleries to their collection.  Out of necessity, he has remained anonymous.  After all he, and the others who practice this craft, are considered vandals in the eyes of the law.

But he has also parlayed this anonymity into a legendary mystique which has only added more of a cache to his work.

Banksy, website, http://www.banksy.co.uk, under Shop

Banksy, website, http://www.banksy.co.uk, under Shop

Though he likes to poke fun at the art world with a rather large pointy stick, he has also benefitted greatly from their interest in his works which are now sold for hundreds of thousand of dollars – which is something he also makes fun of.

So for Thierry Guetta, someone who had been documenting many street artists around the world, meeting Banksy was akin to winning the lottery.   Little would Bansky know that this would be a true collision of two very different perceptions of reality.  Banksy encouraged Thierry to begin putting his footage together for his documentary.  What resulted was an incomprehensible visual disaster called, Life Remote Control. In Exit, Bansky says of this mess, “I didn’t know if I believed he was a filmmaker or a mental patient.”   It was very clear that Thierry was not capable of putting a coherent film together.  So, Banksy suggested that Thierry hand his footage over to him to work on and encouraged him to create his own street art and launch his own show while Bansky and friends did the editing.  What

Banksy, http://www.banksy.co.uk

Banksy, http://www.banksy.co.uk

followed this well meaning reversal of roles provided a very different and unexpected sharp turn in direction for the second half of the film.

That would be the improbable story of Thierry Guetta’s adventures as a newly “minted” street artist called Mr. Brainwash and the monster art show, Life is Beautiful, he organized in L.A. in a former CBS studio warehouse where he eventually sold $1,000, 000 worth of derivative pop art works to a large number of people who believed he was an important artist.  While Banksy’s small team of editors lost their minds combing through hundreds of hours of his tapes to find a few usable seconds of footage, Mr. Brainwash mortgaged his house to create his monster art show which consisted of hundreds of works resembling other artists’ styles including Warhol, Bansky, Shepard Fairey, etc.  As you watch the film, it does not seem to occur to Mr. Brainwash that he is doing anything wrong – just creating his art.  And, because he had helped Banksy and Shepard Fairey in the past, they both helped him with this show and gave him some endorsement quotes – which he exploited to the hilt.  Banksy’s endorsement, a razor-sharp, double-edged sword comment, was posted on Shepard Fairey’s blog, obeygiant.com.  It reads as follows:

“Mr. Brainwash or MBW is the moniker of an eccentric French filmmaker.

MBW has spent the last nine years attempting to make the ultimate documentary about graffiti art. But whilst filming many of the world’s most renowned street artists at work MBW began putting his camera aside and making art of his own. He has graduated from a few hand drawn stickers to giant billboard sized paste-ups, eventually becoming one of the most prolific street artists in California.

MBW does not fit the stereotype of your average street vandal. His artistic process chiefly consists of throwing random modern cultural icons into a blender and turning it up to eleven. The results are by turns profound, provocative and inspirational.

“Life is beautiful” is the first exhibition ever mounted by Mr Brainwash. It takes place in a former Hollywood studio complex and will feature over three hundred paintings, sculptures and prints alongside an installation made from 100,000 shoes and a life-size re-creation of Edward Hopper’s “Nighthawks”.

“Mr. Brainwash is a force of nature, he’s a phenomenon. And I don’t mean that in a good way.”
– Banksy”

The inexplicable success of Mr. Brainwash’s show is the obvious point of the second half of the film.  BanksyBansky says, “I don’t know what it means.  Maybe Thierry was a genius all along, maybe he got a bit lucky.  Maybe it means art is a bit of a joke.”

There is speculation all over the web about whether Mr. Brainwash is a creation of both Banksy and Shepard Fairey to use as a vehicle to pull off another prank but I’m not sure that’s the case here.  They did help him with his show but the person that is Thierry Guetta seems to be very tough to control.  Let’s just say he appears to have the attention span of a child – and I don’t mean that in a good way.  And it doesn’t really matter because the point is made – if you know how to promote something well enough you can get people to buy it no matter if it is a pile of crap or not.

Near the end of the film, in full silhouette, Bansky says he used to think it would be great if everyone created art.   He adds, “I don’t say that so much now.”

I think this is a good thing.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Food, Inc., Waterlife, Moon: Dystopia, Here We Come

Just when you thought it might be getting safer out there with the economy slowly crawling it’s way out of the tank and housing prices showing some signs of recovery,  don’t get too comfortable.  There are reminders that not all is well in other sectors of our world.

The films Food, Inc., Waterlife and Moon, have given me some insights into other global woes – real and potential – that lurk beneath the surface of some things we take for granted as denizens of this planet.

Food, Inc.

Produced and Directed by Robert Kenner, http://www.foodincmovie.com

Food, Inc.

Food, Inc.

Food, Inc. relays information in a fairly straightforward way about the perils of our overly-mechanized food production systems without resorting to scare tactics. Maybe it’s a little slick in it’s own “packaging” but the film has a focussed message that summarizes how so much of our food is mass produced and the dangers inherent in this system.  It seems our Achille’s Heel is our busy lives requiring convenience foods supplied by corporate manufacturing systems that produce processed and fast foods which now dominate most of our food production and consumption.  It’s no news that this food is not the healthiest.  This has been known for quite awhile.  What is surprising is how difficult these systems have made it for independent farmers to compete in a marketplace to provide us with organic alternatives.  This ranges from impossible financial competition to direct capitalistic bullying complete with lawsuits.

The end result is that while some can seek out organic food alternatives, others simply can’t afford them.  One striking story was about a family of four with tight economic means.  The father, the major bread-winner, had been diagnosed with diabetes.  It was further demonstrated that it was far cheaper to feed this family with fast food hamburgers than to buy fresh fruit and vegetables at the grocery store.   A pre-teen daughter was told they couldn’t buy pears because they could only afford to get two of them with the money allotted in their meager grocery budget.  This reminded me of scenes from the film Soylent Green where Edward G. Robinson describes how good real food was when he was a boy to a “pre-NRA spokesman” Charlton Heston.  That film was made in 1973 – thirty-six years ago.  It was one of a number of dystopian-themed films made at the time that reflected a recognition that we were headed down the wrong path environmentally.  Have things changed for the better since then?  Apparently not.

At the end of Food, Inc, we are told what we can do (in a somewhat patronizing way) to change the current state of food production and consumption.  Obviously, buy organic and locally grown foods when you can.  But wait.  There’s a catch.  Free range livestock and organic fruits and vegetables are nurtured and grown with water from our fresh water supply systems.   So, how healthy is our water supply these days?

Waterlife

Directed by Kevin McMahon, www.ourwaterlife.com

Waterlife is a film that summarizes the current state of the water systems within the Great Lakes.  I have been aware of some clean up and revitalization of these waters over the years which was started in the ’70′s.   The water quality is cleaner and better than it was then but it is still not quite clean enough.  And, it is far worse in some lakes than in others.   And while there is still some game fishing in the healthier lakes, zebra muscles and lamprey eels are increasingly stealing their habitats.  Not that you would want to eat most of these fish anyway – they contain too many toxins, trace metals, etc.   But I did learn something a bit more alarming than these already known conditions.  And this has to do with our drinking water supply.


Some of the drinking water in that region naturally comes from or is intermingled with waters from the Great Lakes.  This is inevitable as these bodies of water comprise about 20% of the entire earth’s fresh water supply.  Portions of these waters, along with runoff, are reclaimed and sanitized through our water treatment systems and then delivered through our household taps to our lips.

Sewage treatment plants have not changed significantly in many years.  They were designed to separate particulate matter and then kill off all harmful bacteria.  They perform these functions very well.  However, within the last thirty to fifty years, we have increasingly added other toxins and chemicals which cannot be removed by these processes.  For instance, anyone who has thrown outdated prescription drugs down the drain of their sink or flushed them down the toilet has unwittingly contributed to this problem.  So, when you fill out that form at the doctor’s office asking what drugs you are currently taking – well, you just might not quite exactly know.

And, it actually gets scarier.  The concentration of industrial pollutants in the air and water on Lake Huron in “Chemical Valley” near Sarnia, Ontario is particularly alarming.  Studies on some of these toxins in greater concentrations has provided insight into their effects on human genetics and gender reproduction trends.  In Sarnia, there have been recent dramatically observable demographic changes in the population base of the indigenous native American Indian tribe there.  The ratio of female to male births has changed from about 1:1 to nearly 2:1 within the past several decades.  Needless to say, statistically speaking this is not normal.  This fact was further explored in the recent CBC Documentary, The Disappearing Male, http://www.cbc.ca/documentaries/doczone/2008/disappearingmale.html.  Apparently, male genetics are more susceptible to substances called Endocrine Disruptors which adversely affect the hormone systems in developing fetuses.  Major contaminants attributed to this include synthetic chemicals,  Bisphenol A and Phalates, used in the production of plastics and many consumer items. What items you ask?  They are used to soften plastics and also in other common products such as pvc pipes, medical equipment, dvd’s and oh, yeah – baby bottles.  And I suspect in many more plastic bottles we drink fluids from everyday.

So, all of us are drinking water that contains these contaminants as well as many other chemicals that have been dumped into our respective water supplies.  What can we do to avoid these contaminants? Drink bottled spring water – but what about the plastic bottle?  Go to Lourdes?  Better get a chemical analysis of the water first.

Moon

Directed by Duncan Jones

Moon is a bit of a throw back to classic sci-fi and dystopian films from the past forty years or so.  That’s why I wanted to see it.  I have been hankering for Sci-Fi story telling in movie form that can carry a non-pandering message without excessive violence, gore, dumb characterizations or plot lines and a minimum of exploding cars or machines.  While it is derivative of many past sci-fi and dystopian films (Silent Running, Solaris, Alien, Outland, 2001, to name the obvious) it does include current thematic twists within the story line.  Set in the fairly near future, it seems there is a tidy solution to our increasing energy needs.  Turns out there is an energy rich element produced from ore mined on the Moon.  All we have to do is get a big powerful corporation to build a sophisticated mining operation there complete with a technically superior robot and one man to oversea the whole operation.   The sole mining operator, Sam Bell, has a three year contract which is almost up.  It’s a really good thing because not only is he very lonely, he is starting to hallucinate as well.   I will not reveal any more plot elements so as not to spoil a viewing experience for anyone.   Let’s just say, that when there is a powerful corporation involved ethics regarding an employee’s well-being seem always in short supply.  And while you can guess what is happening to the main character as the film proceeds, it is very enjoyable watching a great performance by Sam Rockwell as the lead character as well as to listen to Kevin Spacey who provides the evenly-modulated voice of the technically superior robot-babysitter ala HAL in 2001.  Though the story line may have been a bit thin for a feature film, I really enjoyed the fact that there were no ear-splitting, gratuitous explosions and no “just-because-you-can-doesn’t-mean-you-should” special effects.  But there are ethical questions posed about recent and future scientific breakthroughs currently within our grasp.  In many ways, this was classic sci-fi story telling and it was refreshment for my soul.

Moving past dystopia

Aside from the obvious dystopian themes, what do these films have in common and why have they surfaced now?  We are currently facing a time filled with uncertainty about the future of everything – economics, energy and environment.  Food, water and energy are the most basic resources needed for human survival.   What all these films point out is our largely collective ignorance about how these most critical resources are made available to us.  There are very few among us that understand the mechanics in place for production and delivery of these commodities.  Is this because we are that lazy or myopic in not being aware about these things?  Yes and No.  These systems have been created in a relatively short period of time compared to the longevity of our residence on this planet.  Most have been put into place within the past fifty years or less.  However, we have become complicit and willing victims of these systems because they have made life easy for us.   This convenience has come with some very large hidden costs which will no doubt become more evident as time passes.

In Soylent Green, the plot hinged on the discovery of how that food substance was made and what it was made from.   We don’t have to do that.  These filmmakers have done that for us.   All we have to do is watch their films and react to them in constructive ways.   What they bring to our attention is the need to be educated about all of these things – and in a hurry.   The fact is, how can you possibly fix anything if you don’t know how it works in the first place?

So, now we have several very convoluted economic and environmental mazes from which we must find our way out of.  The incentives are huge.  But what we all need is some motivation to actually move forward to find our way out of this mess.   May I suggest a very large chunk of locally and organically produced, artisinal cheese?


Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)